The TRUCON Consulting Group, LLC

Home » Strategic Management

Strategic Management

TSM Newsletter Subscription – Link

Strategic Leadership Origins

Key Metrics Every Mid-Size SMBE in Manufacturing or Services Must Track

Small and medium business enterprises (SMBEs) with 50–500 employees operate in a margin-sensitive world where every percentage point of efficiency or waste can determine survival. Unlike startups chasing vanity metrics or enterprises drowning in big data, mid-size firms need a focused dashboard of 8–12 indicators that directly tie to cash flow, customer retention, and operational leverage. The goal is not more data—it is the right data, measured consistently, and acted upon quarterly. Below are the seven most critical categories, with specific KPIs, benchmarks, and collection methods tailored to manufacturing (e.g., machined parts, assembly) and service (e.g., field maintenance, IT consulting) firms.

1. Cash-to-Cash Cycle Time Manufacturing: Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) + Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) – Days Payables Outstanding (DPO)
Services: DSO – DPO (inventory is usually zero)
Why it matters: A mid-size fabricator with $8 M revenue and 45-day terms can free $500 k in working capital by shaving five days off the cycle.
Target: < 60 days total.


How to measure: Export aged receivables/payables from QuickBooks or NetSuite; pull inventory turns from MRP/ERP. Update weekly.

2. Gross Margin Return on Inventory (GMROI) – Manufacturing Only Formula: (Gross Margin % × Annual Revenue) ÷ Average Inventory Value


Why it matters: Tells you if slow-moving SKUs are eating floor space and capital. A metal-stamping shop discovered 22% of SKUs generated 78% of margin; the rest were liquidated.
Target: > 2.5×


How to measure: COGS report + perpetual inventory count; reconcile monthly.3. Revenue per Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) – Services & Shared Formula: Trailing 12-month revenue ÷ average headcount


Why it matters: A 120-person HVAC service firm targeting $150 k/FTE knows immediately when utilization slips below billable-hour targets.
Target: $140 k–$180 k depending on labor intensity.


How to measure: Payroll export + P&L; exclude owners if they draw no salary.

4. Customer Retention Rate (CRR) & Net Promoter Score (NPS) CRR Formula: ((Customers at end of period – New customers) ÷ Customers at start) × 100


Why it matters: Replacing a $50 k/year contract costs 5–7× more than keeping it. Manufacturing OEMs live or die by multi-year blanket orders; service firms by renewal rates.
Target: > 85 % annual CRR; NPS > 50.


How to measure: CRM churn report + quarterly two-question survey (“How likely to recommend? Why?”).

5. On-Time In Full (OTIF) – Manufacturing / On-Time Service Delivery (OTSD) – Services OTIF: % of customer orders shipped complete and on the promised date.


Why it matters: Late shipments trigger chargebacks (1–3 % of invoice) and lost re-orders.
Target: > 95 %.


How to measure: Shipping manifest vs. PO acknowledgment; flag partials.

6. Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) – Manufacturing Only Formula: Availability × Performance × Quality


Why it matters: A CNC shop running at 65 % OEE versus industry 85 % is leaving $600 k on the table at $12 M revenue.
Target: World-class = 85 %; mid-size realistic = 75 %.


How to measure: IoT sensors or manual downtime logs; calculate daily.

7. Contribution Margin per Constraint Hour Identify the true bottleneck—usually a skilled trade, specialized machine, or senior consultant—then calculate revenue minus variable costs per hour of that constraint.


Why it matters: Guides pricing, outsourcing, and capital expenditure. A plastics molder raised prices 18 % on high-runner parts once they realized the injection press was the constraint, not labor.


How to measure: Standard costing module + capacity log. Implementation Framework

Centralize: Push all seven KPIs into a single Power BI or Google Data Studio dashboard updated no less than monthly.

Assign owners: CFO owns cash cycle; plant manager owns OEE/OTIF; service delivery head owns utilization and OTSD.

Set thresholds: Green/yellow/red gates trigger mandatory review in the monthly ops meeting.

Close the loop: Every red metric must have a 30-day corrective action plan with an owner and budget.

Mid-size SMBEs that measure only revenue and EBITDA are flying blind. The seven metrics above form a closed-loop system: cash cycle funds inventory and labor; inventory and labor drive delivery; delivery drives retention; retention drives predictable cash. Master these, and growth becomes a choice rather than a hope.

  • Track Cash-to-Cash Cycle (< 60 days) to unlock working capital without new debt.
  • Measure Revenue per FTE ($140 k–$180 k) and Contribution per Constraint Hour to price and schedule profitably.
  • Demand > 95 % OTIF/OTSD and > 85 % CRR to eliminate chargebacks and sales churn.
  • Push OEE to 75 %+ and GMROI to 2.5× (manufacturing) to turn fixed assets into cash engines.

By: Dr. Gary D. Seale                                                                                                                                 

The Trucon Consulting Group, LLC

The need for a strategic management analysis may be required for a multitude reasons. They include the need for ongoing competitive analysis, a loss of revenue, a dramatic shift in your industry, the worldwide economy, or feedback from trusted associates. The specific area of concern must be recognized to determine the standards of performance for that segment of the business. If significant areas of underperformance are recognized, then research and a root cause analysis should be performed to establish viable benchmarks. The goal is to be as objective as possible to create realistic action plans. This can be accomplished by a method call triangulation. Just as a Global Positioning System (GPS) requires three geographic points to be accurate, business research requires an investigation into verified existing literature, followed by qualitative and quantitative research. The researcher must be aware of their own biases to reduce the prejudices that creep into an investigation. This potential bias is called bracketing. Objectivity is paramount in the effort to serve your organization.

The first step is an extensive literature search. The extant literature is found in academic and technical journals typically published within the last five years. This relatively inexpensive method will yield in depth articles germane to the area of interest. Google Scholar is a good place to begin a literature research effort (https://scholargoogle.com). You will discover free information that took hundreds of hours of research, analysis and writing on demand. Simply start your search with broadly named queries and continue to narrow down the titles until you discover appropriate articles. A literature search may save you countless hours of investigation and the expense associated with the effort.

 Qualitative analysis is the second step in the research effort. IT involves examining non-numerical data, such as text, images, or observations, to identify patterns, themes, or meanings. It focuses on understanding the context, perspectives, or behaviors behind the data, often using methods like interviews, focus groups, or content analysis to derive insights. This allows the researcher to discover a greater understanding of the issues beyond what a metrics only investigation might yield. This reveals the emotions and history that drive the decision making in an organization. It brings fears and negative consequences into the spotlight that may not present themselves in a quantitative research effort. Qualitative research can be categorized into nodes of information that allows the decision makers to grasp the quality of the feedback derived from this type of research. It aids with a deeper understanding of the perceived barriers to progress. This understanding opens the doors to conceptualize a superior plan for solutions that genuinely solve problems.

Quantitative analysis the third step in the analysis effort. It is a systematic approach to evaluating numerical data to inform decision-making, often used in finance, economics, and research. It involves collecting, processing, and analyzing measurable data to identify patterns, trends, or relationships. Techniques include statistical modeling, regression analysis, and data visualization to derive insights. For example, in finance, it is used to assess investment risks or forecast market trends. By relying on objective metrics, quantitative analysis minimizes bias, enabling precise predictions and strategic planning. Tools like Python, R, or Excel are commonly employed to manage large datasets, ensuring robust, evidence-based conclusions in complex scenarios.

 For intercompany quantitative research, the use of a survey tool using probing questions and responses taken with a Likert scale response are useful. The five potential responses reveal the gamut of potential answers and still allow a quantitative evaluation with a descriptive analysis report and a bar graph for visualization. A descriptive analysis report can be obtained with most AI platforms. Graphical illustrations are readily obtained using MS Excel software.

The fourth step is to determine where there is a gap between the current performance and the desired performance. This objective evaluation helps the strategic management team to develop action plans that address the issues uncovered during the gap analysis. These actions plans will need to be prioritized for their return on investment potential. After the evaluation phase, the fifth step is to develop a thorough change plan to be implemented to ensure that the new methods or approach will be implemented in the organization. Be aware that change can be very difficult for some people. A thorough plan for communicating the reasons for the change must be implemented. Sell the benefits for the changes to not only the company, but the company associates as well. Be aware that effective change does not come on a rapid basis. Your change team should have the power and authority to enforce and influence change until it becomes an ingrained part of your company culture.

Summary

The systematic approach of conducting a literature search, performing qualitative research and quantitative research are the three methods of extracting valuable information. This is called triangulation. It is used to ensure the most objective analysis possible for your organization. It involves outside expertise, insider experience, and anonymous surveys and scientific experiments to capture the breath of information required to make the best strategic management decisions for your organization. The gap analysis helps to generate actions plans that aid in creating a competitive edge that is necessary for long-term business survival.

Gary Seale understands how important your time and business are to you as an owner or senior manager of the organization. This system offers an outside perspective built on these analytical tools and decades of business experience. Don’t hesitate to contact me to discuss your business situation and determine if an engagement with the Trucon Consulting Group could create a net advantage for your company.

Dr. Gary D. Seale – Strategic Management

The Trucon Consulting Group, LLC

www.truconbd.com  512-529-7045

GDS@truconbd.com      

Bridging the Gap Between Internal Teams and External Stakeholders

Compilation of Gary D. Seale – Trucon Consulting & GROK

In today’s fast-paced business environment, effective collaboration between internal teams and external stakeholders—such as clients, partners, vendors, or investors—is critical for organizational success. Miscommunication, misaligned goals, or lack of transparency can create friction, leading to missed opportunities or project failures. Bridging this gap requires intentional strategies that foster trust, streamline communication, and align expectations. By prioritizing clear processes and leveraging technology, organizations can create a seamless flow of information and build stronger relationships.

One key to bridging the gap is establishing clear communication channels. Internal teams must maintain consistent messaging when interacting with external stakeholders to avoid confusion. Regular updates through shared platforms, like project management tools or collaborative software, ensure everyone stays informed. For example, tools like Slack or Asana allow real-time updates, reducing the risk of miscommunication. Additionally, designating a point of contact, such as a project manager, helps streamline interactions and ensures accountability. Transparency is equally vital. External stakeholders often lack insight into internal processes, which can lead to distrust or unrealistic expectations. By sharing relevant progress reports, timelines, and challenges, internal teams can build credibility and foster collaboration.

For instance, a quarterly report or a shared dashboard can provide stakeholders with a clear view of project milestones, enhancing trust. Another critical factor is aligning goals. Internal teams may prioritize operational efficiency, while stakeholders might focus on ROI or timely delivery. Regular alignment meetings, such as kickoff calls or progress reviews, help clarify objectives and ensure all parties work toward shared outcomes. These meetings also provide a forum to address concerns early, preventing costly misunderstandings. Cultural and contextual awareness also plays a role. External stakeholders may operate in different industries, regions, or time zones, which can create disconnects. Internal teams should adapt their communication style to suit stakeholders’ preferences, whether through formal reports or informal check-ins. Understanding these nuances builds rapport and strengthens partnerships. Finally, feedback loops are essential. Actively seeking input from external stakeholders and incorporating it into internal processes demonstrates respect and fosters collaboration. Surveys, feedback forms, or post-project reviews can provide valuable insights for improvement. By implementing these strategies, organizations can bridge the gap between internal teams and external stakeholders, creating a cohesive ecosystem that drives success.

Key Points:

Clear Communication: Use shared tools and designate a point of contact to streamline interactions.

Transparency: Share progress reports and dashboards to build trust and manage expectations.

Goal Alignment: Hold regular meetings to ensure internal and external priorities align.

Cultural Awareness: Adapt communication to stakeholders’ contexts for better rapport.

Feedback Loops: Incorporate stakeholder input to improve processes and collaboration.

Define external stakeholders

External stakeholders are individuals, groups, or organizations outside a company who are affected by or can influence its activities, decisions, or outcomes. They typically do not work within the organization but have a vested interest in its performance or operations. Examples include:

Clients or Customers: Those who purchase or use the company’s products or services.

Suppliers or Vendors: Entities providing goods or services to the company.

Investors or Shareholders: Individuals or groups funding the company or holding equity.

Partners: Organizations or entities collaborating on projects or initiatives.

Regulators or Government Agencies: Bodies overseeing compliance with laws or regulations.

Community Groups: Local or societal organizations impacted by the company’s actions.

These stakeholders interact with the company externally and play a key role in its success or challenges.

Strategic Leadership & Management

Taneja (2023) and her research associates explain the origins of strategic leadership and management by explaining the discipline as an offshoot of business policy classes taught at the university level. They proceed to cite multiple well-known authors from the early years of strategic leadership investigation as a stand-alone focus area. These authors developed theories and postulations that included a competitive analysis model. They also stressed the importance of strategic management at every level of the organization. One investigation defined companies as market prospectors, defenders, and analyzers as it pertains to the approach to their customers and prospects. Strategic management terms such as plan, ploy, pattern, and perspective were coined as strategy management terminology. Their literature review also defined strategic management as a resource-based discipline. A commonly accepted model of strategic leadership has been labeled as the five P’s. These elements include purpose, principles, processes, people, and performance. Each element is an integral component of the strategic management discipline. Purpose is the direction of the organization defined by the missions, vision, goals, and strategies established by the leadership of the entity. Principles are core values that are established as unwavering guidelines for the operation of the organization. Processes are a necessary definition of the manner in which work teams achieve goals. People are normally considered as the individual employees who perform the work. Performance relates to an individual’s measurement of effort and the results they achieve.


Leave a comment