Leadership and Productivity

The following document and research results have been extracted from a doctoral dissertation written by Dr. Gary D. Seale in August of 2025, while finishing the degree requirements in Strategic Management at the school of business of Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia. The foundation of the study is directly related to the potential issues generated by senior strategic managers and the culture that develops because of their leadership. These issues are addressed in qualitative literature that serves as a reliable basis for the study and constitutes the foundation of the study. To confirm the issues may or may not exist in the single organization required personal interviews and a Likert scale survey. This feedback constitutes a foundational aspect of the study. Workplace culture can have a detrimental or a positive effect upon the employees of the organization (Gebian, 2023). The areas of concern for this study are the cultural impact on the productivity and profitability of the company under consideration. Existing research reveals that there is a direct relationship between the leadership culture and productivity. The transformational style of leadership is generally acknowledged as the style prone to generate a win-win mentality between senior leaders, the human relations managers and the employees (Boutamine & Benlaharche, 2024). Transactional leadership is stated to be a command-and-control style that is only acceptable under dire circumstances.

Background of the Problem

Due to the highly competitive nature of business in the digital age, every aspect of the business culture was taken into consideration when assessing the strengths and weaknesses of an organization (Wolniak, 2024). This includes the human resource assets of any organization. The culture created by the senior managerial staff has been documented as a source of productivity or a possible detrimental influence (Wisnu, 2024). Gebian (2023) stated that some leaders struggle with a lack of integrity, not providing leadership or fostering a warm culture, causing low job output and a reduction in profits. This discouraging culture fosters a lack of hope for the future for the employees. A lack of hope causes disassociation with the company and its goals.

Additional investigation from a biblical worldview perspective yields three fundamental aspects of human nature that are inherent in every person. These three issues are concisely stated in 1^st John 2:16. This verse states, “For everything in the world—the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life—comes not from the Father but from the world.” (Life Application Bible: New International Version. 1991, 1^st John 2:16). These three aspects clearly indicate that a person can rely on ungodly values to make decisions. When a manager seeks to please themselves physically, has a focus on materialism, and leads a self-centered, boastful life, then it is easy for them to mistreat other people in the name of productivity and profitability. These inherent drivers of human nature may be the cause of overt conduct some leaders embrace in their management strategies. They may very well result in abusive physical conduct, exploitative behavior, and extreme competitiveness. However, a supportive culture will mirror the values of a Christian worldview that promote trust, productivity, and profitability.

Some organizations provide substandard career development programs, have insufficient income packages, and noncompetitive benefits, instigating poor job performance, high turnover rates, lost production, and a decrease in profits (Junianti, 2023). This is evidenced by the loss of productive and effective employees to other organizations, as well as decreased productivity. However, this paper offered multiple solutions to the negative issues caused by the substandard human relations policies. They include opportunities for career growth, employee training, feedback, open communication, rewards for contributions, competitive pay, and benefits. Some leaders do not recognize or reward employees, causing a lack of motivation, worker disassociation and lost productivity (Lin et al., 2020). These observations pointed to a need to deeply understand the human psyche.

There is a distinct difference between employees who desire to progress in their field and those individuals who are content to exist in the status quo. The potential edge in productivity and profitability mandated the effort to conduct research in this area of business (Lin et al., 2020). A supportive culture makes a difference in competitiveness that spells longevity for a high-tech organization. But a difficult culture leads to dissociation, high turnover rates, low productivity, and lost profitability. This study addressed how to influence senior leadership when they are challenged with a company culture that may be impeding productivity and profitability in the enterprise.

Problem Statement

The purpose of this qualitative case study was to extend the current body of knowledge within the context of the general problem statement and the specific problem. Furthermore, the purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore the challenges some leaders face managing strategic organizational culture, resulting in lower productivity and lost profitability. Through the use of a primary question this case study addressed the managers, leadership, the culture they perpetrate, and the possible consequences that result from that culture. The purpose revealed underlying motivations such as competitiveness and peer pressure (Soniewicki, 2022). Revealing and addressing issues promotes a robust, progressive culture that allows organizations to retain their talent pool (Junianti, 2023). The purpose of the study produced a critical competitive edge that is essential to fostering a viable, long-term business. A critical aspect of identifying issues with the managers, leadership and the culture of any organization is the trust, care, and compatibility factors that a Christian worldview should propagate. Understanding cultural influences in the high-tech industry, the inherent diverse nature of people’s personalities, and the competitive nature of business served the purpose of this research (Sun, 2024).

Research Question and Sub-questions

The research questions within this single-case study discovered the manager’s challenges in managing the organizational culture as they correlate to lower productivity and lost profitability. These four questions were qualitative in nature. The questions were directed at the manager’s challenges in a sense that will aid the researcher in narrowing down viable solutions to the problem. They identified causative issues like punitive culture, low pay, weak benefit packages, leader’s worldviews, and poor working conditions. Research results tied the causative conditions to the lower productivity and lost profitability consequences. These research questions aided in identifying the root causes with the strategic leaders as well. The research questions are as follows:

RQ: How can the problem of the challenges some leaders face managing strategic organizational culture be solved?

RQa: What behaviors contribute to low job productivity and lost profitability?
RQb: What behaviors contribute to a lack of motivation and worker disassociation?

RQc: Why do some leaders not recognize or reward employees?

Discussion of Triangulation

Triangulation was used as a research method. This meant using diverse sources to capture information about the topic of interest. This was done by using qualitative and data triangulations to analyze and verify postulations. The use of multiple perspectives was used to create an objective research report that is trusted (Bans-Akutey & Tiimub, 2021). As a result, bias can was dramatically reduced. Methodological triangulation combined qualitative and quantitative research to seek out the most viable solution or answers (Arias -Valencia, 2022). In an additional paper addressing triangulation, methodological triangulation was defined as the adoption of different complementary triangulation methods to yield a superior result (Quintão et al., 2020). Methodologic triangulation can also point to qualitative and quantitative data-collection methods, analysis, and interpretation (Schlunegger et al., 2024). The methodological triangulation method allowed a comprehensive examination that produced a qualified conclusion to the research questions.

Consequently, methodological triangulation was the method of choice for this investigation. Triangulation utilized methodological perspectives to address the same research problem. This method aided in insuring that the issue received a thorough examination that eliminated blind spots and bracketing in the research effort.

Qualitative Methods. Qualitative research focused on understanding complex phenomena by analyzing non-numerical data. It prioritized depth, context, and meaning, capturing subjective experiences and perspectives (Yadav, 2022). Unlike quantitative research, which measures variables, qualitative research embraces open-ended inquiries. Semi structured interviews were the primary source of qualitative information in this investigation.

Quantitative Methods. This research project used a quantitative, Likert Scale survey to serve as the triangulation method. Quantitative research addressed the numeric trends of the cause-and-effect actions in the marketplace. It took the subjectivity out of managerial decisions and direct actions based on observable facts (Borgstede & Scholz, 2021). It also helped to measure the macro effect of the economy in contrast to the market approach used by the organization (Kumar et al, 2023). Quantitative research addressed the numeric trends of the cause-and-effect actions in the marketplace. It took the subjectivity out of managerial decisions and direct actions based on observable facts (Borgstede & Scholz, 2021). In this research project the five point Likert scale responses aided the researcher when the interview responses were analyzed. The ability to apply a descriptive statistics analysis delivered supporting evidence that the qualitative responses are reliable.

Summary

Triangulation involved using multiple sources and perspectives, such as qualitative and quantitative approaches, to analyze information while reducing bias. Methodological triangulation combined these methods for a thorough examination of research questions, enhancing objectivity and minimizing blind spots. Qualitative research focused on studying a phenomena’s nature and symptoms using literature reviews and interviews to explore experiences like management, leadership and morale. Quantitative research emphasized numerical data to identify trends, evaluate actions, and remove subjectivity through surveys and statistical analysis. Together, these methods provided a vigorous exploration of the research topic, ensuring plausible and trustworthy conclusions.

Research Framework Diagram

Text Box: Actors

• Senior Leadership Strategic Managers

• Human Resource Managers

• Employees Text Box: Concepts

• Influence of organizational culture

• Employee turnover and causative factors

• Human resources, development, or maintenance Figure 1

Actors

Senior Strategic Leadership Managers. Research regarding senior strategic leadership managers asserts that five primary attributes benchmark their roles. These roles include purpose, principles, processes, people, and performance (Taneja et al., 2023). As seen in Figure 1, strategic leaders are related to the specific problem because they are responsible for the people and performance policies that have an impact on performance and profitability.

Human Resource Managers. Human resources managers influence employee performance within an organization via growth in employee performance, through good management and its practices that affect the organization and its production (Doaa, 2024). These managers administrate the policies that provide the formal benefit package to the employees. They also ensure compliance with the laws established by the government. As evidenced in Figure 1, human resource managers are related to the specific problem because they carry out the directives from the strategy leaders regarding production employee performance that affects productivity.

Employees. This study reveals that strategic leadership creates a stimulating environment through influence, intellectual encouragement, personal consideration, and enhancing employee motivation, which influences organizational performance. This statement from Jain indicates the nature of employment in the early twenty-first century. The employee population has predominantly moved from manual labor to intellectual activities. Employees are related to the specific problem because they are responsible for carrying out the directives from the strategic management team. Figure 1 reveals that employees are typically viewed as a functional unit at the lowest level of employment. However, this does not belie the nature of their influence on productivity and profitability.

Leadership. Begec and Akyuz (2023), comprised an extensive list of twenty first century leadership characteristics which include strategic perspectives, problem solving, results oriented, analytical, use of digitalization, transformational, and customer centric skills. A full range of leadership skills is necessary to provide superior guidance when confronted with a specific problem. As reflected in Figure 1, the critical nature of leadership is imperative with senior management as they cope with organizational culture issues. Consequently, leadership skills are the critical component of this research on culture and the effects it can have on productivity and profitability. Strategic leadership should be aware of the forces in the marketplace that impact the organization positively or negatively (Taneja et al, 2023). There were five areas that leaders should be cognizant of at all times. Technology, globalization, diversity, innovation, security are enumerated as those essential areas. If all five concerns are addressed with due diligence, then the employees are more inclined to devote themselves to the tasks at hand with a quality perspective. However, evidence of weak leadership in these areas caused quality employees to think twice about devoting themselves to an institution that does not address these potential threats to the employees and the well-being of the organization. In an additional study on the relationship between leadership and morale indicate a correlation between transformational leadership that yields positive morale and innovative (Ellis, 2024). Conversely, an autocratic leadership style produces employee dissatisfaction and high turnover rates. The study concludes that there is a need for more adaptive, engaged, and culturally sensitive practices by leadership to create a supportive and productive work environment that will generate organizational performance and healthy welfare for the company associates.

Employee Productivity. Organizations should focus on implementing effective talent management practices, fostering a positive organizational culture, and involving employees in shaping the culture to improve employee commitment, satisfaction, and employee productivity (Oladimeji et al., 2023). Talent management starts with hiring the most qualified individuals available in the marketplace. Not only do they need to be a good fit for the job description, but they also need to mesh well with the company culture. The point about fostering a positive organizational culture is congruent with the purpose of this research effort. A neglectful atmosphere is seen as a pathway to employee disassociation with the purpose, vision, and mission of the organization. Disassociation may lead to employee turnover, low productivity, and lost profitability. Employee involvement is critical to the morale enhancing concept of allowing the associate to have an essential role in their job function. As seen in Figure 1, as one of the primary actor groups, employees can have an influential role in developing the desired culture. In an additional study addressing employee productivity, the author isolated the constructs of competence, motivation, and technology as they relate to employee productivity (Saepudin et al., 2024). The purpose of his paper is to determine how organizations can manage these factors to benefit the company. Saepudin (2024) concluded that employers should pay close attention to the creation of a supportive culture, provide incentives, and offer career development opportunities to encourage higher levels of motivation.

A Review of Professional and Academic Literature

This review of this professional and academic literature revealed a great deal of information on the essential elements of managing a business and the morale factors involved. With a focus on strategic management, the research revealed how management policies can have an influence on the employees, their productivity and the resulting profitability (Sinnaiah et al., 2023). These works included information on innovation, talent management, employee productivity and profitability, virtual teams, employee turnover, communications and human resources. Innovation encompasses an openness in the organization to outside ideas and research conclusions. Talent management is an enormous area of significance in the high-tech industry due to competitive forces in the marketplace. The very costly concerns about employee turnover rates were reviewed. And finally, information regarding communication and human resources roles were reviewed. This approach produced significant insights into the general and specific problems posed by the research questions. This literature discussion provided diverse opinions about strategic management, culture, and the impact of different policies on morale and productivity.

Business Practices

The employees of the organization and the productivity they generate are of primary concern to the senior management in the organization. In this research, profitability is tied directly to the productivity of the employees. This includes creating a discernable difference and a competitive edge in the marketplace. Ultimately, this is the responsibility of the senior management in the company. Recently, transformational leadership has been recognized as a superior method of energizing employees to maximum productivity. Transformational leadership understands that genuine collaboration with the employees is a critical component of morale and productivity (Boutamine & Benlaharche, 2024). Compensation and benefit packages are also known to be a foundational aspect of attracting, retaining and motivating employees to produce quality results (Junianti, 2023). Hiring, assigning employees, and retaining the best people is a critical aspect of best business practices in the high-tech industry. These issues are component pieces of management’s directives and the human resource department managers who carry out the directives. Cyber security has now become an ongoing threat to every organization, and it demands management’s attention. The ability to be innovative in a volatile world is critical (Rengkung et al., 2024). Based on this information, the management methods provided by the senior level strategic managers are a critical concern to every stakeholder in the company. They facilitate the business practices of the organization. This includes product development, human resource policies, security, production decisions, financial infrastructure, supply chain, creating a competitive edge, plus sales and marketing efforts. Ultimately, the future success of the organization relies on management’s decisions and directions.

The Problem

The general problem to be addressed was the challenges some leaders face managing strategic organizational culture, resulting in lower productivity and lost profitability. As the culture in the United States has metamorphized into more of a collaborative culture in the twenty first century, it can be observed that employee treatment and morale are critical factors regarding retention, productivity, and profitability (Junianti, 2023). The specific problem that was addressed was the possible challenges some leaders face, within the high technology industry, within the selected single case organization, managing strategic organizational culture, possibly resulting in lower productivity and lost profitability.

The concern that was voiced in the general problem statement was substantially addressed as the first concept in the concepts section. Organizational culture and the impact that the strategic management personnel in an organization make on that culture is a complex and diverse topic. Organizational culture (OC) refers to the shared norms, values, beliefs, and attitudes that influence the behavior of all members within an organization (Tadesse et al., 2024). It is shaped by underlying assumptions, protocols, and fundamental principles. OC is often categorized into four key characteristics: involvement, consistency, adaptability, and mission. Common elements of OC include shared beliefs, customs, rituals, and behavioral norms. It provides a lens for analyzing organizations and encompasses sociocultural activities, work procedures, recurring perceptual patterns, myths, symbols, and collective attitude (Abdullahi et al., 2016). Ultimately, OC serves as the foundation for developing shared norms and guiding organizational dynamics.

Regarding the specific problem which asks about the “possible challenges some leaders face, within the high technology industry, within the selected single case organization, managing strategic organizational culture, possibly resulting in lower productivity and lost profitability” there was and is a definite literature gap that does not present this issue in the high-tech industry. However, there is guiding research that will direct the investigation in the quest for discovery. Abane (2022) and his research associates wrote that there are four key principles of organizational culture: consistency, engagement, flexibility, and mission. Involvement plays a crucial role by empowering individuals, encouraging teamwork, and fostering talent development, but for it to be effective, all members—managers, supervisors, and employees—must be committed to the organization’s mission. The researchers also highlighted the sociocultural framework in which organizations operate, influencing employee worldviews and shaping workplace dynamics. A stable organizational culture, rooted in shared beliefs, values, and principles, attracts and retains employees while promoting consensus even in the face of differing viewpoints. A well-integrated and consistent culture leads to more productive and efficient organizations. Moreover, aligning cultural values with performance objectives enhances productivity. By integrating systems and individuals to create synergy, organizations can boost employee commitment and improve task management. However, the lack of system integration and employee engagement can be detrimental to commitment and improvements.

Organizational Culture. There are three main factors that influence performance, namely organizational culture, motivation, and well-being (Gebian, 2023). Given the rise in mental health issues post COVID-19, prioritizing employees’ well-being and forming a workplace that supports their mental health is considered an ultimate challenge in sustaining a long-term competitive advantage for organizations (Bhoir & Sinha, 2024). A good organizational culture has a positive influence on employee performance due to the clear guidelines it provides. The employees have a sense of direction, structure, and they share a common goal. This superior sense of motivation leads to improved performance because the associates feel compelled to a higher level of achievement. The corresponding level of motivation and communication helps the workers feel appreciated for their performance. A similar sense of value and motivation result when they realize that their welfare is valued by the organization. The organization’s human resource department must understand these concepts as a method of improving performance and organizational goals. Conversely, when the organization does not adequately address culture, motivation, and well-being, it is likely that productivity and profitability will decline. A focus on culture and productivity will aid in the discovery of issues and solutions that reflect on the title of this paper, The Detrimental Influence of Organizational Culture and Motivation on Employees Resulting in Lower Productivity and Lost Profitability.

Organizational culture significantly shapes employee attitudes and outcomes, influencing job satisfaction and engagement (Jo & Shin, 2025). Key factors include recognition, fairness, involvement, and transformational leadership. Recognition fulfills employees’ need for esteem, boosting morale and satisfaction, while fairness fosters respect and harmony. Involving employees in decision-making promotes empowerment and productivity, and transformational leadership inspires personal and professional growth, creating a positive work environment critical for retaining talent and ensuring organizational success. Gebian (2023), Bhoir & Sinha, (2024), Jo & Shin, (2025) supported the belief that organizational culture, motivation, and well-being are functions that promote or inhibit performance.

Workloads and competition play pivotal roles in job satisfaction. Excessive workload leads to stress and burnout and decreasing satisfaction. Burnout, recognized by the World Health Organization as an occupational phenomenon caused by unmanaged workplace stress, is characterized by exhaustion, cynicism, and inefficacy (Demerouti, 2024). Diagnostic tools often overlap with other conditions like anxiety and depression. It is primarily triggered by high job demands and low resources. However, there are no clear links to specific personality traits when considering stress and burnout. Burnout harms individuals and organizations, and while stress-relief interventions help, their long-term effectiveness is limited. Organizational strategies to improve work conditions, coupled with empowering employees, show promise in reducing burnout. It would be negligent to ignore stress and burnout in a business and cultural environment where these concerns are self-evident.

Despite the concerns about stress and burnout, moderate competition can drive motivation and satisfaction. But excessive competition increases stress and negatively impacts job satisfaction. Organizations must strike a balance by managing workloads and fostering a supportive yet competitive environment. Gebian (2023) stipulates that employee productivity increases profitability. The measurements are straightforward: Work results executed and measured in alignment with the assigned job responsibilities. That is a measurable quality and quantity of work produced by the individual. Results represent a measure of integrity and truth that cannot be ignored. Consequently, the fundamental relationship between employee productivity and increased profitability were cornerstones to this research effort.

Motivation is defined as the power that drives someone to act or exert energy towards achieving stated goals. This requires a conscious effort that generates a psychological stimulus to engage the necessary steps for success. Motivation becomes a source of strength to learn and improve existing conditions (Hu, 2022). Hu’s views correlate well with Gebian (2023), Junianti (2023), Jo and Shin (2025) as they discuss motivation and productivity issues. It becomes an internal source of power that directs people to apply themselves with diligence. Consequently, the senior strategic management staff needs to understand the factors that create motivation and produce a work atmosphere to increase worker motivation. Junianti (2023) adamantly states that motivation is directly tied to productivity and profitability. This publication does offer several activities that may generate motivation such as meeting individual needs, the work environment, and support. Individually, a person’s self-confidence, ability, and experience may enhance their personal motivation. Motivation is categorized as being extrinsic or intrinsic. An organization will be responsible for generating extrinsic motivational tools and supporting the culture that promotes intrinsic motivation.

Employee welfare is defined as complementary remuneration in the presence of material and non-material aspects founded on wisdom, with the goal of maintaining and improving the physical and mental status of the employees. The goal is to have productivity increases from the employees. The well-being condition is associated with health-related concerns, education, continued employment, financial considerations, and the social environment (Nimbagal et al., 2024). Welfare is a system that includes programs and services that help people to meet social, economic, educational and health needs that are fundamental to maintaining society. Corporate welfare programs improve employee productivity, focusing on the impact of evolving information technology. It defines these programs and highlights their role in boosting motivation, job satisfaction, and loyalty (Liu, 2024). It links welfare programs to improved retention and efficiency. Using theories like motivation, expectancy, and fairness, Liu (2024) explains how corporate culture and different types of welfare offerings influence productivity. The insights into the structure of the organization and the benefits it derives are critical to this research and future conclusions.

The culture created by the senior managerial staff has been documented as a source of productivity or a possible detrimental influence (Wisnu, 2024). The key element in this discourse is the responsibility of the strategic managers to consciously develop a culture of productivity. Previous cultural influences in the high-tech industry, the inherent diverse nature of people’s personalities, and the competitive nature of business all combine to influence both the leadership and the employees (Anderson & Sun, 2024). This research conveys the complex nature of creating and sustaining a work culture in the highly competitive and volatile marketplace. Agile leadership is a form of senior administration that relies on collaboration, flexibility, and adaptability. The goals are to create creativity, flexibility, and consistent progress in the company’s culture and expectations (Porkodi, 2024). A significant benefit is the relatively abbreviated period of time in which the company can react to an opportunity or challenge. Agile leadership is an essential element in this report based on the complex and volatile business community where a majority of enterprises operate.

Accurate conclusions will aid strategic management leaders because the qualitative, single case study with a flexible design method develops the most comprehensive case for cultural changes (Dźwigoł & Trzeciak, 2023). St-Denis (2023) has noticed a trend in employment practices that coincides with a transactional culture. This trend has been recognized as a result of the give and take between firms that are using contract employees to lower costs and the response of the workforce that has no loyalty to an employer. The “Amazonification” of the workforce, conceptualized as the deliberate and systematic shift toward prioritizing productivity and efficiency over the well-being of employees, is quickly becoming the new normal within the manufacturing sector (Hartnell et al., 2023). The productivity and sustainability of an organization is closely related to the effective management, motivation, and strong competence of the members of the organization. Productive and sustainable organizations usually have leaders who can lead the team, provide clear direction, and show confidence in team members (Jumawan et al., 2023). It is important for this researcher to be aware of current employment practices because they are critical aspects of the organization.

The subtle yet toxic relationship between dysfunctional passive, laissez-faire management, employee burnout, and related psychological stressors has been examined (Leary & Miller, 2021). The authors acknowledged the issue yet did not convey a qualified response. Consequently, from an organizational perspective, few solutions exist to raise outcomes associated with such detrimental relations. However, more exhaustive research has been performed on laissez-fair management, and it came to more definitive recommendations (Robert & Vandenberghe, 2021). They surmised that organizations should train managers to address laissez-faire behaviors alongside positive leadership practices. Effective action depends on understanding both situational factors and employees’ specific needs, as discrepancies between leadership behavior and employee expectations may influence the impact of such leadership. Interventions should focus on enhancing leader-employee relationships and fostering organizational commitment, adapting to employees’ self-concept levels. Laissez-faire management can undermine employees’ relational potential and drive inappropriate behaviors, so practitioners should invest in understanding and meeting employees’ identity-related needs. Diversity in employees’ characteristics should inform recruitment and socialization processes, ultimately strengthening organizational bonds, improving performance, and increasing employee retention. However, Leary and Miller (2021) did recommend a more rigorous assessment of senior managerial candidates to uncover the toxic attributes of laissez-faire management. This harmful style is appropriate for the purpose of the study because it may cause great harm to the culture, productivity, and profitability of the organization.

Employees react to feedback content in a way that is concurrent with the model presented in this research: They increase their effort if the feedback provided indicates that the benefit of increasing productivity is high and exhibit a decreased effort if they deem that it is marginal (Awaysheh, 2023). When the management team has a focus on their employees’ needs, this has a positive effect on organizational productivity (Lee et al., 2020). This conclusion is another piece of evidence confirming the negative influence of laissez-faire management.

Competition economics could benefit from the integration of strategic management and innovative economics. Management scholars can properly introduce and apply concepts such as isolating mechanisms, capabilities development, and ecosystem competition into the discussion regarding competitiveness in the tech industry (Teece, 2023). The essential concern is that innovation must be given the high priority it deserves because of rapid changes in the high-tech industry and the intensity of the competition in the marketplace.

Employee Turnover and Causative Factors. A competitive salary is more apt to increase retention for the employer and increase a desire to stay for the employee, just as noncompetitive income increases the probability of leaving the organization (Masood, 2024). Employee retention is a critical challenge for businesses. While compensation is a key factor in retention, the research emphasizes that it is not the sole determinant. Competitive pay encourages employees to stay, but organizations must also address other essential factors, such as job satisfaction, work-life balance, career development opportunities, employee engagement, recognition, communication, company culture, leadership, and additional benefits. A comprehensive approach that values and addresses these diverse needs is crucial for retaining top talent and ensuring long-term organizational success and sustainability.

Compensation in conjunction with the benefit package aligns with the proclamation that career growth consists of training, effective education, organizational compliance, prestige, and organizational commitment (Al-Suraihi et al., 2021). These training packages in conjunction with organizational rewards increase employee confidence in their future at the organization. They also increase their intention to stay with the organization. However, job stress can have a significant negative effect on turnover intention. Diminished job satisfaction can increase the intention to leave, just as increased satisfaction can create retention according to Al-Suraihi (2021). A significant factor related to employee turnover is the wage factor. The relationships are intuitive. Higher wages tend to promote higher levels of retention, and lower wages correlate to a higher intention to leave the organization. The concept of social capital is now a source of power in the organization. This means that trust driven relationships and open communication create a motivation to pull for the team goals in lieu of individual recognition. This leads to an understanding that vulnerability and courage in leadership are important building blocks of the adaptive workplace. This is not to say that the new era of collaboration has magically displaced the possibility of a toxic atmosphere. As can be seen, Al-Surahi’s (2021) views mimic Masgood’s (2024) regarding the impact that income has on retention and the loss of employees.

When appointed managers begin to decrease communication, reduce benefit packages, practice duplicity, and the company loses their competitive edge, then the overt signs of a declining company begin to surface (Liu, 2024). Innovation declines, employees leave the company, disassociation increases, and finger pointing abounds when a company spirals downward. Diminished morale and resistance to change also surface as an indicator of a toxic atmosphere. The causes of a decline in cultural productivity can range from managerial changes, rapid organizational changes, questionable ethics, economic changes, and industry fluctuations. When the values of the organization change, it can also lead to serious dissatisfaction in the ranks of the employee. Bahrain et al., (2023) and his research associates concurred by stating effective communication in the workplace faces numerous barriers, including misunderstandings, inefficiencies, and conflicts. These challenges became more pronounced due to the COVID-19 pandemic, with factors like multigenerational workplaces, remote work, scattered teams, new communication technologies, and varying employee expectations further complicating communication. However, communication barriers existed well before the pandemic, causing confusion, misunderstandings, and even offense. These publications all tend to confirm the detrimental consequences that may surface in the form of a negative attitude, reduced productivity and higher turnover rates.

Human Resources. Human resource policies that encourage engagement and upward mobility in the organization are essential. This contrasts with a human resource set of policies that only foster the status quo. A recent human resource policy research effort demonstrates the difference between human resource policies that support upwardly mobile employees versus ones that offer no support to the employees who desire to move forward in their career (Lin et al., 2020). The study categorized HR practices into two bundles: Development-Oriented Practices which include training, performance appraisal, promotions, incentive compensation, and other practices that foster employee growth and human capital development. Maintenance-Oriented Practices that focus on job security, compensation, and flexible work schedules to support employees’ stability. Achievement motivation whichwasmeasured through employees’ orientation toward learning and performance goals. A scale evaluating individuals’ goal-setting behaviors showed that achievement motivation is significantly associated with workplace performance, accounting for 62% of variance. This study reinforces the importance of HR policies and motivational factors in shaping employee development and retention.

Organizations are facing increasing challenges due to globalization, technological advancements, and the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, making employee resilience more crucial than ever (Long et al., 2025). Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) provide essential support through services like mental health counselling, wellness initiatives, and life coaching to help employees navigate change. Traditionally seen as remedial solutions for workplace issues like stress and absenteeism, EAPs may also play a strategic role in building long-term employee resilience, though this aspect remains underexplored. Resilient employees perceive change as an opportunity for self-improvement and development, enabling them to embrace change initiatives with increased readiness and assurance (Hartmann et al., 2020).

Talented employees are essential to business success, as they significantly impact organizational performance. Effective talent management involves key processes such as recruitment, compensation, professional development, and leadership training (Tej et al., 2021). However, many organizations struggle with high turnover rates and must implement Human Resource strategies that foster employee loyalty and commitment. Research suggests that compensation and performance management, including career development and growth opportunities, are the most influential factors in retaining talent.

Constructs

Leadership. Begec and Akyuz (2023), comprised an extensive list of twenty first century leadership characteristics which include strategic perspective, problem solving, results oriented, analytical, use of digitalization, transformational, and customer centric skills. Although leadership can be thoroughly described and measured on a Likert scale, it remains a somewhat subjective topic. A leadership style may be acceptable to one group, but highly objectionable to another. Consequently, it must fall into the category of being a construct rather than a concept.

Management and leadership may be inextricably connected (Hall, 2023). This qualitative research uncovered multiple perspectives on the correlation between management and leadership. These views include transformational, authentic, servant, adaptive, ethics, team, gender, and cultural forms of leadership. This is an important question in business situations because a utilitarian form of management marginally addresses the physical or psychological needs of the employees. Servant leadership has gained significant attention due to its comprehensive approach and impact on outcomes like organizational commitment, job performance, and satisfaction (Canavesi & Minelli, 2022). Originating in the United States, the concept was introduced as a philosophy that emphasizes a leaders’ focus on followers’ growth and ethical treatment. This leadership style prioritizes serving others’ needs over personal gain. Hall’s introductory question reveals that leadership should not be a forgone conclusion when examining the roles of managers in a corporate environment.

The business world has become so complex it is difficult to be a subject matter expert in every aspect of an enterprise (Nunez, 2016). To aid in understanding the type of leadership that works with a diverse culture and a complex organization, Hall (2023) separated leadership into two categories. Transformational and transactional leadership are common, but by no means equally effective styles of leadership. Transformational leadership happens when leaders and followers collaborate, work collectively, and acquire a shared common purpose. Transformational leadership encourages followers. In contrast, transactional leadership is an authoritarian, top-down style that dictates orders and accepts limited feedback from employees under a senior level structure. Recent research reveals that diverse cultures and sexes consider transformational leadership as far more successful. One way to approach transformational leadership is to assume the role of being a servant leader. A servant leader has the awareness that every member of the team is a valuable asset. Their role is to bring the team together with an elevated level of communication. They align the energy of the team to take actions that help the organization achieve goals via wise, value driven efforts. This knowledge about servant leadership and being transformational are essential elements in directing a cultural perspective. This specifically applies to the younger generation of workers due to their personal sensitivity perspective.

Transactional leadership emphasizes teamwork by fostering collaboration, positive communication, and trust among team members, which enhances organizational performance (Dong, 2023). However, it must balance teamwork with individual autonomy, because excessive focus on collaboration can hinder independent thinking and decision-making. For transactional leadership to work effectively, integrity to be a cornerstone of the organization. Honesty and trustworthiness are consistent standards of conduct that all the employees expect and trust. This benchmark is combined with open communication and a level of authenticity that dispels duplicity. This means that the appointed leadership must be willing to share wisdom, insights, and doubts to create a personal reputation of authenticity with all the associates. Dong’s (2023) observations provide multiple insights regarding the use of a transactional leadership style in a 21^st century organization. Shared leadership fosters integrity by encouraging team members to act in the common interest of the team while aligning with organizational goals (Klasmeier et al., 2025). This collaborative leadership approach strengthens trust as team members demonstrate ability, benevolence, and integrity by taking on responsibilities, solving problems, and supporting a positive team environment. The resulting trust enhances team performance and increases leaders’ confidence in their team. These authors’ research findings unknowingly collaborate to confirm the conditions under which transactional leadership will be effective in the marketplace. Furthermore, these findings deliver an additional method for leadership to influence the culture in an organization.

Regarding transformational leadership, Korakis & Poulaki (2025) boldly stated that leaders must practice emotional intelligence to truly be transforming. This means to be aware of their own emotions, as well as the emotions of their business associates. This requires acute observational skills combined with reflection and empathy. This requires that the appointed leader be keenly aware of the other person’s situation to accurately understand their constraints, joys, and fears. Transformational leadership is also considered to be an excellent way to combat “social loafing” in an organization (Khan et al., 2020). Social loafing is known as the tendency of individuals who exert less effort when working in groups than working individually. It results in lower productivity. It is negative employee behavior associated by individuals with lower motivation. These kinds of behaviors may result in low productivity and poor commitment in their tasks and toward their employer. Even though the majority of the leadership articles referenced are bias toward a positive situation, Khan addresses a universal issue that will contribute to a loss of productivity if left unchecked.

A communication barrier is any factor that disrupts the reception and understanding of messages, leading to inefficiencies and warped information flow. Poor communication can result in dissatisfied employees who may feel undervalued and disengaged, potentially impacting innovation and overall organizational success. Employees are vital to any business’s operation and growth, making effective communication essential (Hu, 2022). Addressing these barriers is critical for cultivating a communicative, collaborative workplace culture. Organizations can implement strategies to overcome these obstacles, such as enhancing teamwork, engagement, and overall success. Hu’s (2022) observations should provide the management of an organization with insights regarding methods of improving a work culture.

The quality of effective communication allows it to make an impact both within and outside organizations (Rizvi, & Popli, 2021). It addresses concerns about how the organization engages in meaningful conversations and the uncertainty surrounding specific communication attributes and their outcomes. The research identified gaps in communication skills and emphasizes the need for deeper engagement with subordinates. It proposed a communication assessment tool focusing on two key factors: transforming thoughts and transforming individuals. The employee–organization relationship is built on trust, power dynamics, satisfaction, and commitment between employees and their workplace (Curado et al., (2022). A strong relationship benefits both parties, with organizational factors like mission statement quality, management philosophy, ethical climate, psychological empowerment, job autonomy, and work–family interference influencing employee satisfaction.

Communication plays a crucial role in fostering employee satisfaction, relationship-building, and the absorption of organizational culture and values (Curado, 2022). It operates on three levels: organizational, leadership, and peer interactions. Organizational communication strengthens the employee–organization relationship by creating a network of interdependent relationships that influence attitudes, feelings, and skills. A well-functioning communication system leads to higher employee satisfaction, trust, and a sense of community (Petković & Rapajic, 2021). Leader communication significantly impacts employee attitudes and engagement. Employees feel more satisfied when communication is symmetrical, valuing leaders who listen and show sincerity, understanding, and compassion. Effective managerial communication fosters pride and joy among employees, improving workplace morale.

Employee Productivity. Organizations should focus on implementing effective talent management practices, fostering a positive organizational culture, and involving employees in shaping the culture to improve employee commitment, satisfaction, and employee productivity (Oladimeji et al., 2023). Talent management starts with hiring the most qualified individuals available in the marketplace. This is the first step towards creating a productive workplace.Certainly, it can be argued that productivity is objective and measurable, however in this investigation the focus is on the actions that influence morale, engagement, creativity, and a sense of belonging. From this perspective employee productivity fits into the construct category.

Employee performance is a key factor in organizational success, influenced by motivation, aptitude, and access to resources. Human resource management plays a vital role in maximizing productivity and efficiency by recognizing diverse working styles and fostering willingness among employees (Zhenjing et al., 2022). Performance appraisals help assess commitment and competence, but businesses struggle with establishing effective evaluation frameworks. Additionally, workplace environment, physical and behavioral, impact motivation, creativity, and engagement, with research showing mixed effects on employee productivity and job satisfaction.

Hybrid remote work, unlike fully remote setups, does not negatively impact productivity and can be beneficial for organizations by reducing employee attrition (Bloom et al., 2024). Additionally, it provides societal advantages, such as fewer commuting demands and improved childcare flexibility, making it a valuable option for both businesses and employees. Investment has long been recognized as a key driver of productivity growth, with economists linking higher research and development spending to improvements since the mid-20th century (Williams et al, 2025). Research continues to highlight investment as a significant factor, with studies examining both private investment’s impact on firms, industries, and the broader economy, as well as public investment’s role in overall productivity. The discussion expands on these areas, particularly in relation to the United Kingdom’s productivity puzzle, incorporating insights from academic experts. Williams (2025) goes on to report that a lack of quality infrastructure, human talent availability, and a deficit of quality management staff all contribute to the flat productivity issue in England.

Servant leadership, rooted in biblical principles, emphasizes selflessness and prioritizing the well-being of others (Okharedia, 2020). Servant leaders are those individuals who empower and facilitate the success of their followers rather than seeking personal gain. Research has consistently shown that servant leadership fosters positive outcomes, including increased employee effort, satisfaction, and organizational effectiveness. Twenty key attributes of servant leadership have been identified, divided into functional traits like vision, integrity, trust, and empowerment, and accompanying traits such as communication, influence, and stewardship. Servant leadership contributes to followers’ well-being, reinforcing the idea that leadership is a dynamic process shaped by the leader, followers, and their environment.

Reflecting today’s global competition and digital configuration, current research reveals that open innovation emphasizes integrating ideas and technologies from both internal and external sources to accelerate innovation and enhance competitiveness through collaboration with external partners. In contrast, closed innovation relies solely on internal resources for research and development, focusing on safeguarding intellectual property and maintaining control. While open innovation leverages diverse networks for creative solutions, closed innovation can limit progress by restricting the flow of new ideas (Rengkung et al., 2024). Supporting this statement, Chen (2022) wrote that intellectual property management (IPM) plays a crucial role in fostering innovation and maintaining competitiveness. Proper management of intellectual capital encourages creativity and technological development while preventing excessive competition. Countries worldwide are actively working to enhance IPM capabilities to strengthen their innovation potential. Resources and innovation are considered as capabilities that managers have available via their position in the company. As a result of this research, the strategic managers in the organization must make a decision on the innovation philosophy that the organization will adopt. The concern is the willingness to be openly innovative and the level of transparency that the company will have with academia, shareholders and competitors.

Open innovation has been a major topic in academic debate, with companies like Intel using external research from universities and peers to drive progress (Bejarano et al., 2023). While open innovation has had positive impacts, it also presents challenges, such as competitive risks and the uncertain financial benefitshighlighted in recent studies. This article examines the limits of open innovation, exploring how failure, risk, and cost affect outcomes within teams and organizations. Researchers emphasize that failure in open innovation can be just as common as success, potentially harming organizational cultures and leading to setbacks. Additionally, as engineering and technology grow in complexity, society’s expectations for open innovation increase, creating new obstacles. To overcome these hurdles, experts from diverse fields, ranging from business and law to psychology and the arts, must collaborate to design efficient strategies and policies.

No other form of innovation has caught the business world’s attention like artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has long been a topic of public discourse, often dramatized in sci-fi as a force that could replace human labor (Dwivedi et al., 2021). However, AI is already integrated into daily life and plays a crucial role in business, medicine, and government strategy. Recent academic focus has shifted from performance studies to examining AI’s broader impacts and consequences. Definitions of AI vary, but they generally describe non-human intelligence designed to perform tasks like learning, speech, and problem-solving. Some scholars emphasize AI’s ability to adapt and learn from external data, enhancing its efficiency in specialized fields. While AI excels in specific applications, human-level intelligence, emotions, and complex reasoning remain beyond its reach. The overarching theme is AI’s growing capability to automate tasks once performed by humans, reshaping workplaces and society (Olhede & Wolfe, 2019). The strategic managers will by necessity be forced to make decisions about incorporating AI into their organization to create more efficiencies and drive costs out of the organization.

AI plays a crucial role in helping Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs) tackle obstacles, foster collaboration, and engage with both customers and suppliers (Skare et al., 2023), ultimately boosting productivity. The increasing adoption of AI by SMEs in manufacturing has led to greater supply chain flexibility (Dey et al., 2023), lower maintenance costs, and improved risk forecasting. However, integrating AI into business operations and production remains a difficult process, particularly as many SMEs struggle with digitalization, limiting their ability to leverage AI-driven solutions (Andrea et al., 2021). Researchers also point out that AI implementation is expensive, requiring significant IT resources and highly skilled personnel. While past studies have largely examined the technical aspects of AI integration, further investigation is needed to understand how SMEs undergo digital transformation when incorporating AI into their manufacturing workflows (Skare et al., 2023).

AI adoption can be examined through the framework of organizational strategy and capabilities (Weber et al., 2023), particularly in relation to dynamic capabilities. Resource Orchestration (RO) theory offers a unique perspective for understanding how businesses effectively manage AI technologies, human resources, and operational processes to generate value (Zhang et al., 2021). RO theory enhances comprehension of resource allocation by focusing on the pivotal role of managers in transforming resources to drive business success. This theory provides a broader lens for analyzing AI implementation (Dey et al., 2023), illustrating the mechanisms through which organizations recognize, acquire, and coordinate the use of AI-related assets.

The majority of the research stands in support of an open style of innovation to foster the well-being of the company. Tying the organizational culture and the motivation of the employees to productivity and profitability related to innovation is a logical and emotional position (Wisnu, 2024). The goal of the organization is to thrive and sustain a competitive edge for the mutual benefit of every stakeholder. In the digital business culture where high-tech companies compete, innovation is a necessary component of staying in business.

The work from home changes that emanated to a large degree from the isolation mandates during the global pandemic of 2019 were the subject of a paper by (Barnes and Kotera, 2024). The COVID-19 pandemic placed management assumptions and operative practices globally under once-in-a-lifetime pressure. The management of many companies had to establish practices to ensure productivity and equal practices for the employees who were working remotely. The new work from home model required a different approach regarding management of the employees’ practices. The major challenges for the managers involved rapid change and a higher degree of workplace uncertainty. Fortunately, these changes did not damage productivity but increased it during the peak of the work from home period. This aspect of conducting business in a post-COVID work environment must be addressed due to the volume of the issue.

The COVID-19 crisis was an area that challenged the human resource (HR) teams on a global basis (Hamouche, 2023). HR departments scrambled to facilitate work at home programs and create a sense of fairness to those individuals who were impacted. These adaptive programs were developed out of necessity. However, they could easily be perceived as unsupportive programs by the associates who wanted a clear path to upward mobility. It can be ascertained that Lin (2020) and Hamouche (2023) have congruent findings as they pertain to human resource programs, retention and job satisfaction. The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the fluidity of the workplace, now seen as any space where work occurs, including digital environments, transforming traditional notions of organized work locales. Consequently, human resource managers should be mindful of promoting the concept of meaningful work.

Cultural Issues Abound. It was anticipated that the literature search would reveal a significant volume of articles regarding leadership’s oversight deficiencies that influenced the productivity and profitability of an organization (Taneja, 2023). It was true that several researchers pointed out the possibilities for disassociation, lowered productivity, and higher turnover rates due to cultural differences in the workplace. However, most of the material addressed ways the leaders could proactively confront the negative culture that may cause declining productivity. It was interesting to note that the tangible benefit packages (Income and benefit packages) were cited as the primary causative factors influencing disassociation, burnout, poor morale, and turnover rates in contrast to competitive benefits to encourage loyalty and productivity. There is little or no mention of the impact that a Christian worldview would have on morale, productivity, and profitability.

Leader’s Worldview. Due to the highly competitive nature of the global economy and the fallen nature of mankind, it is anticipated that more investigative research would report on the pressures inherent in leadership positions (Hall, 2023). Competitiveness is attributed to the visibility made possible by the internet and the pressure to be more financially successful in a global economy. The pressures may also come from ownership, the board of directors, and corporate investors. These forces could shape a worldview that justifies a win at any cost mentality. Succumbing to pressure from a non-Christian worldview means to allow ego, pride, and physical temptations to overwhelm the inhibitions that benchmark an ethical approach. This level of capitulation may lend itself to a stunted culture that limits productivity and profitability. This aspect of business rarely presented itself in the literature search.

Employee Turnover. Employee turnover received consistent attention throughout the leadership research (Junianti, 2023). This is an anticipated theme. However, it is logical that the issue received this amount of attention due to the expense of losing experienced employees. The typical expenses associated with losing an employee are lost productivity, plus the cost of recruiting and training a new person. High rates of turnover are symptomatic of a poor working culture in many cases. The loss of experienced employees may affect the morale of the remaining associates because of increased workloads and negative perceptions about the company culture.

Trust Through Positioning. Warren Bennis’s element labeled trust through positioning reveals an anticipated theme (Askew, 2023).Trust is a concept that warrants deep introspection and can be complex and fickle in nature. The individual components are competence, constancy, caring, fairness, candor, and authenticity. Authenticity was singled out as the critical issue in trust development. Employees want to be treated fairly and as mature adults in a working culture. Bennis noted that without trustthe organization would be an ambiguous nightmare. There would be no certainty, no internal reliance, and no accountability. A manager should engage in the employees’ buy-in of the organizational values via the creation of strategies, systems, and activities that are consistent and dependable to earn trust.

High-Tech Drives Work Structure. This theme was uncovered during the research. Due to the nature of the high-tech industry, this environment drives a different structure that many other industries. High-tech is characterized by high-speed, rapid change, work teams, intellectual property issues, collaboration, and talent competition. In addition, the globally competitive nature of the industry tends to add more pressure to the employees. This is particularly true of the senior management team. They are responsible for forming a company that has a competitive advantage in the face of all the previously listed factors that are necessary for the enterprise to remain viable in the marketplace. Without an agile management / leadership perspective, there is a strong possibility of losing their place in the marketplace.

High-Tech Does Not Require a Different Organizational Culture Approach. This theme was discovered during the research. Admittedly, a high-tech organization does function differently compared to a traditional production line or retail-oriented business. However, it was discovered during the literature search and the researcher’s investigations, people essentially have the same (although complex) set of motivations no matter what industry they work in. As a result, the management team can rely on the same motivational methods that tend to work well in any other industry (Akdere & Egan, 2020). This is a key discovery that substantially aids both the researcher and any high-tech management team when they recommend new approaches to enhance productivity in a high-tech workplace.

Summary of the Literature Review

Globally there are eight impactful issues facing strategic managers in the current business environment. They are listed as: 1) technology, 2) globalization, 3) diversity, 4) ethics, 5) innovation, 6) security,7) terrorism, and 8) violence in the workplace. Strategic managers must ensure that strategy, structure, culture, values, and performance criteria are developed and aligned with the vision of the organization. Junianti (2023) published a study investigating the influences of managerial decisions in four areas related to employees. The four areas are career growth, salary, job satisfaction, and organizational culture. The results of employee performance research state that there are three main factors that influence performance, namely organizational culture, motivation, and well-being (Gebian, 2023). Hall (2023) and his research associates opened their paper by asking if management and leadership are inextricably connected. Their qualitative research uncovered multiple perspectives on the discipline. These views include transformational, authentic, servant, adaptive, follow-ship, ethics, team, gender, and cultural forms of leadership.

Lin et al., (2020) reveals research regarding organizational structure that demonstrates the difference between human resource policies that support upwardly mobile employees versus ones that offer no support to the employees who desire to move forward in their career. The COVID-19 pandemic placed leadership assumptions and operative practices globally under once-in-a-lifetime pressure. The managers of many companies had to establish practices to ensure productivity and equal practices for the employees who were working remotely. Command and control leadership styles are outdated because the most recent generational phase of employees will not respond to authoritarian methods. As a result, the requirement for productivity and profitability demands an authentic leadership style that extracts the highest level of productivity from their associates.

The literature review provided insightful information on the need for innovation, talent management, and employee productivity. It also revealed an ongoing concern with virtual teams. The expensive aspect of employee turnover is presented as having both positive and detrimental effects. The ever-present concerns over communication issues were discussed as well. Cyber security is included because of the potential damage to the organization both financially and operationally.

The related studies uncovered during the pursuit of this research offer intriguing factors that may serve senior strategic managers as they seek to guide their companies. They include the use of pre-employment personality testing, the use of industry norms for individual enterprises, the credence given the competition, millennial challenges in the workplace and artificial intelligence. The themes revealed during the investigation must also be given due consideration during strategy decisions and implementation. These themes include cultural issues, the leader’s worldview, the impact of employee turnover, and trust gained or lost via the positioning of the company.

Significance of the Study

The strategic leadership of an organization is ultimately responsible for every component of the business (Ediningtyas et al., 2024). Some of the aspects are clear and self-evident because they are represented in the inter-company accounting reports, 10-K reports, and the financial accounting published in the annual reports. These numbers reveal operating costs, the cost of goods sold, gross profit margins, taxes, depreciation, net profit after taxes, debt levels, and extraordinary expense events. However, there are cultural aspects of the organization that have a tangible impact on the financial well-being of the firm as well. These cultural aspects provided the researcher with an internal perspective regarding leadership values, integrity, and expectations. The way the employees are treated has a major influence on morale, productivity, and profitability (Jain et al, 2024). Previous leadership articles report on the potential positive or detrimental aspects of having a culture that engages with the employees or causes them to disengage with the purpose of the organization. Never-the-less, cultural leadership is a key factor in the highly competitive global economy because leadership may provide a differentiating edge in an organization. This research paper fills a gap discovered in the literature by stating that the fallen nature of mankind into innate sinfulness is the potential root cause of a sub-standard company culture. Obtaining a whole-hearted engagement from the employees is the difference that provides excellence in the goods and services delivered versus a simple “good enough” mentality. This can mean repeat business and a loyalty factor that is difficult to obtain otherwise. A negative environment leads to non-competitive position that causes the organization to decline into a weakened status that ultimately spells the demise of the company. Consequently, these are compelling reasons to conduct the study.

Improving Business Practices

The specific problem to be addressed is the possible challenges some leaders face, within the high technology industry, within the selected single case organization, managing strategic organizational culture, possibly resulting in lower productivity and lost profitability. The platform for addressing the specific problem was established by investigating the general problem. It has been established that the leadership in an organization is responsible for producing an organizational culture. The culture may be inclusive, affirming, and transformational (Jain et al., 2024). Or it may be a mixed culture of positive reward and negative consequences that are found in a transactionally managed organization (Young et al., 2020). The industry focus is the high-tech category. This is defined as a company that works in and produces new technology for the marketplace. The products may be in multiple categories such as information technology, electronics, gaming, communications, medical, and electronic commerce.

Taneja (2023) and her research associates explain the origins of strategic leadership and management by explaining the discipline as a by-product of business policy classes taught at the university level. They proceed to cite multiple well-known authors from the early years of strategic leadership investigation as a stand-alone focus area. These researchers developed theories and postulations that included a competitive analysis model. For example, innovation is considered to be an essential aspect of competitive strategy in the 21^st century marketplace (Agazu & Kero, 2024). Innovation plays a crucial role in improving competitiveness and performance across various industries. Studies highlight the positive relationship between sustainability innovations, innovation competence, and firm competitiveness, emphasizing the related factors influencing these outcomes. For manufacturing medium to small enterprises, innovative capabilities are strongly linked to enhanced firm performance. These definitions help to set the stage for an investigation into leadership challenges. Taneja’s (2023) team also stressed the importance of strategic management at every level of the organization. One investigation defined companies as market prospectors, defenders, and analyzers as it pertains to the approach to their customers and prospects. Strategic management terms such as plan, ploy, pattern, and perspective were coined as strategy management terminology. Perspective has an impactful influence on strategy.

Leadership effectiveness evolves through interconnected events and feedback, serving as a cornerstone for organizational performance and growth (Agazu & Debela, 2024). It provides a competitive edge by influencing employees’ attitudes, beliefs, and abilities to achieve organizational goals. These elements communicate the perspectives of the leadership team, which are in agreement with Taneja’s findings. The preceding observations gleaned from Taneja (2023), and Agazu & Debela (2024) inform the reader and the researcher how senior managers have a significant influence on the culture.

St-Denis (2023) noticed a trend in employment practices that coincides with a transactional culture. The author states that employee retention remains a high priority, yet at the same time the employers are far less likely to offer long-term stable employment. Workers have responded by developing their own career strategies that include multiple job changes. Consequently, the employers have developed counter strategies that have been labeled as “worker capture strategies.” These policies are unilateral. Their goal is to forcefully retain workers without developing a sense of loyalty from the employees. These policies include non-compete agreements, no employee raiding agreements between companies, and TRAP clauses. A TRAP clause stipulates that if an employee leaves the company, they must repay any cost of training previously provided.

Schärrer & Sender (2023) report a significant trend regarding the employment of contract workers in lieu of full-time employees. The paper states that 20-30% of the working population in the United States and the European Union are nontraditional workers. This produces new challenges for the strategic leaders responsible for restricting costs, developing a positive culture, and increasing productivity. It is essential to comprehend the business changes influenced by the digitalization of the global economy, rapid transportation, and global competitiveness (Pleşa et al., 2023). The increasing capabilities of artificial intelligence and robotics are emerging factors as well. The leadership must understand the impact these changes are having on the workplace culture in the high-tech industry. Strategic leaders must also recognize the capabilities of a younger, computer literate generation, and the diversity of the current workforce. These same leaders should be aware of these competitive forces to effectively lead their organizations and make the necessary strategic management decisions that signify a profitable, stable organization.

Summary of the Significance of the Study

The management of an organization is ultimately responsible for every component of the business. Some of the aspects are clear and self-evident because they are represented in the inter-company accounting reports, 10-K reports, and the financial accounting published in the annual reports. However, there are cultural aspects of the organization that have a tangible impact on the financial well-being of the firm as well. These cultural aspects provide the researcher with an internal perspective regarding the firm’s values, integrity, and expectations. The way the employees are treated will have a major influence on morale, productivity, and profitability (Jain et al, 2024). St-Denis (2023) has noticed a trend in employment practices that coincides with a transactional culture. The author states that employee retention remains a high priority, yet at the same time the employers are far less likely to offer long-term stable employment.

Additional investigation from a biblical worldview perspective yield three fundamental aspects of human nature that are inherent in every person. These three issues are concisely stated in 1^st John 2:16. This verse states, “For everything in the world—the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life—comes not from the Father but from the world.” (Life Application Bible: New International Version. 1991, 1^st John 2:16). These three aspects clearly indicate that a person may rely on ungodly values to make decisions. As managers in an organization, it is incumbent for those individuals to have a comprehensive understanding of all the functional aspects of the organization (Ullah et al, 2022). Poor decisions made by the management will place the organization in a noncompetitive position in the marketplace. These poor decisions can be made in personnel selection, the provision of benefits, the compensation package provided, dishonest business practices, a negative cultural perspective, and abuse of the employees. This review of strategic management responsibilities includes the culture creation that influences productivity in an organization.

Purpose Statement

The purpose of this qualitative case study was to extend the current body of knowledge within the context of the general problem statement and the specific problem. Furthermore, the purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore the challenges some leaders face managing strategic organizational culture, resulting in lower productivity and lost profitability. Through the use of a primary question this case study addressed the leadership, the culture they perpetrate, and the possible consequences that result from that culture. The purpose revealed underlying motivations such as competitiveness and peer pressure (Soniewicki, 2022). Revealing and addressing issues promoted a robust, progressive culture that allowed organizations to retain their talent pool (Junianti, 2023). The purpose of the study produced a critical competitive edge that is essential to fostering a viable, long-term business. A critical aspect of identifying issues with the leadership and the culture of any organization was the trust, care, and compatibility factors that a Christian worldview should propagate. Understanding cultural influences in the high-tech industry, the inherent diverse nature of people’s personalities, and the competitive nature of business served the purpose of this research (Anderson & Sun, 2024).

References

Aldane, J. A., Adamtey, R., & Ayim, V. O. (2022). Does organizational culture influence employee productivity at the local level? A test of Denison’s culture model in

Ghana’s local government sector. Future Business Journal, 8(1), 34.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-022-00145-5

Abdallah, A. S., Amin, H., Abdelghany, M., & Elamer, A. A. (2024). Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital: a systematic review, integrated framework, and agenda for future research. Management Review

Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00454-9

Abdullahi, A. I., & Zainol, F. A. (2016). The impact of socio-cultural business environment on entrepreneurial intention: A conceptual approach. International

Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(2), 80-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i2/2013

A. G., & Kero, C. A. (2024). Innovation strategy and firm competitiveness: a systematic literature review. Journal of innovation and entrepreneurship, 13(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00381-9

Agarwal, S. A. (2021). Use of statistics in research. International Journal for Modern

Trends in Science and Technology, 7(11), 98-103..

https://doi.org/1046501/IJMTST0711017

Agazu, B., & Debela, K. (2024). Leadership Effectiveness: A Systematic Literature

Review. Library Leadership & Management, 38(2).

https://doi.org/10.5860/llm.v38i2.7611

Akdere, M., & Egan, T. (2020). Transformational leadership and human resource development:

Linking employee learning, job satisfaction, and organizational performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 31(4), 393-421. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21404

Akhmad, M., Chang, S., & Deguchi, H. (2021). Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink:

their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure. Journal of Computational

Social Science, 4, 455-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00083-8

Akpa, V. O., Asikhia, O. U., & Nneji, N. E. (2021). Organizational culture and organizational performance: A review of literature. International Journal of

Advances in Engineering and Management, 3(1), 361-372. DOI: 10.35629/5252-

0301361372

Alabi, A. T., & Jelili, M. O. (2023). Clarifying Likert scale misconceptions for improved application in urban studies. Quality & Quantity, 57(2), 1337-1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01415-8

Albers, M. J. (2017). Quantitative data analysis—In the graduate curriculum. Journal of

Technical Writing and Communication, 47(2), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281617692067

Allsop, D. B., Chelladurai, J. M., Kimball, E. R., Marks, L. D., & Hendricks, J. J. (2022). Qualitative methods with Nvivo software: A practical guide for analyzing qualitative data. Psych, 4(2), 142-159. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych4020013

Al-Suraihi, W. A., Samikon, S. A., Al-Suraihi, A. H. A., & Ibrahim, I. (2021). Employee turnover: Causes, importance and retention strategies. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.3.893 Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. (2024). Re‐Envisioning a Hierarchy of Leadership Behaviours

Using Insights from the Psychological Literature on Personality Traits. Journal of

Management Studies, 61(4), 1165-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12922

Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. (2024). Re‐Envisioning a Hierarchy of Leadership Behaviours Using Insights from the Psychological Literature on Personality Traits.

Journal of Management Studies, 61(4), 1165-1191.

https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12922

Arendt, J. F., Pircher Verdorfer, A., & Kugler, K. G. (2019). Mindfulness and leadership: Communication as a behavioral correlate of leader mindfulness and its effect on follower satisfaction. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 414486.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00667

Arias Valencia, M. M. (2022). Principles, scope, and limitations of the methodological triangulation. Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n2e03

Askew, N. P. (2023). Leading with principle: the essential role of ethical leadership in adaptive

Environments. Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics, 20(5).

https://nabpress.com/leadership-accountability-and-ethics#:

Babatunde, F. T., & Onoja, E. D. (2023). The effectiveness of retention strategies on employee retention. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 13(1), 481. ,

DOI: 10.37421/2161-5833.2023.13.481

Bailey, D. E., Faraj, S., Hinds, P. J., Leonardi, P. M., & von Krogh, G. (2022). We are all theorists of technology now: A relational perspective on emerging technology and organizing. OrganizationScience, 33(1),1-18.

https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1562

Bahrain, N. K., Sakrani, S. R., & Maidin, A. (2023). Communication barriers in work environment: understanding impact and challenges. International Journal of

Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(11), 1489-1503. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i11/19498

Bans-Akutey, A., & Tiimub, B. M. (2021). Triangulation in research. Academia Letters, 2, 1-6.

https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3392

Barcelos, E. J. B. V., Amatucci, M., Borini, F. M., & Raziq, M. M. (2022). Renewing a subsidiary’s innovative capabilities through flexible design, contextual ambidexterity, and external embeddedness. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 24, 556-573. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v24i3.4188

Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2023). Daily transformational leadership: a source of inspiration for follower performance?. European

Management Journal, 41(5), 700-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.04.004

Barnes, K., Vione, K., & Kotera, Y. (2024). Effective leadership practice among senior leaders working from home and in the hybrid workplace across COVID-19. SN Business &

Economics, 4(5), 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-024-00651-4

Battista, A., Torre, D., & Konopasky, A. (2024). Essential concepts for effective mixed methods research in the health professions: AMEE Guide No. 173. Medical Teacher, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2024.2401464

Begeç, S., & Akyuz, G. A. (2023). Requirements of collaborative and transformational leadership in digital ecosystems: techno-orchestrating leaders in a vuca world.

Revista de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020230505

Bejarano, J. B. P., Sossa, J. W. Z., Ocampo-López, C., & Ramírez-Carmona, M. (2023). Open innovation: A technology transfer alternative from universities. A systematic literature review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity,

9(3), 100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100090

Bhoir, M., & Sinha, V. (2024). Employee well-being human resource practices: a systematic literature review and directions for future research. Future Business

Journal, 10(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00382-w

Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2024). Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature, 630(8018), 920-925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-

Bolt, Ester Ellen Trees, Jonathan Winterton, and Kenneth Cafferkey. (2022). “A century of labour turnover research: A systematic literature review.” International Journal of

Management Reviews 24.4 (2022): 555-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12294

Bonini, A., Panari, C., Caricati, L., & Mariani, M. G. (2024). The relationship between leadership and adaptive performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS One, 19(10), e0304720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304720

Borgstede, M., & Scholz, M. (2021). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to generalization and replication–A representationalist view. Frontiers in psychology,

12, 605191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.605191

Boutamine, M., & Benlaharche, S. (2024). The CEO’s Influence on Organizational Outcomes at Microsoft: A Perspective on Transformational Leadership in the Tech

Sector. South Asian Journal of Management, 31(2), 7-27.

DOI:10.62206/sajm.31.2.2024.7-27

Bulach, C., Lunenburg, F. C., & Potter, L. (2012). Creating a culture for high performing schools:

A comprehensive approach to school reform (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman &

Littlefield Business & Management, 11(1).

https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2340129

Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and practice, 2(1), 14.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-

Canavesi, A., & Minelli, E. (2022). Servant leadership: A systematic literature review and network analysis. Employee responsibilities and rights journal, 34(3),

267-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-021-09381-3

Carp, L. S. (2024). Organizational culture and company performance. Ovidius University Annals,

Economic Sciences Series, 24(1), 401-407. Communications, (0). https://stec.univ-center

Chandrasekar, A., Clark, S. E., Martin, S., Vanderslott, S., Flores, E. C., Aceituno, D., … & Vera San Juan, N. (2024). Making the most of big qualitative datasets: a living systematic review of analysis methods. Frontiers in big Data, 7, 1455399.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2024.1455399

Chen, H. (2022). The impact of intellectual property protection on the development of digital economy and regional entrepreneurial activity: Evidence from small and medium enterprises. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 951696.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951696

Chen, M., & Li, W. (2024). Social capital development on interest-based networks:

examining its antecedents, process, and consequences. Humanities and Social

Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02609-1

Chuey, A., Asaba, M., Bridgers, S., Carrillo, B., Dietz, G., Garcia, T., … & Gweon, H. (2021). Moderated online data-collection for developmental research: Methods and replications. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 734398.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734398

Clapham, M. M. (2021). Characterizations of successful leaders: A comparison of leadership and non-leadership students. Journal of Leadership Education, 20(2), 1-11.

https://doi.org/10.12806/V20/I2/R1

Coghlan, D. (2021). Edgar Schein on change: Insights into the creation of a model. The

Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(1), 11-19.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320924029

Cohen, M., Fernandes, G., & Godinho, P. (2024). Measuring the impacts of university-industry

R&D collaborations: a systematic literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer,

1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10114-5

Coombes, P. (2024). Systematic review research in marketing scholarship: Optimizing

rigor. International Journal of Market Research, 66(6), 687-693.

DOI: 10.1177/14707853231184729

Cross, R., Benson, M., Kostal, J., & Milnor, R. J. (2021). Collaboration overload is sinking productivity. Harvard Business Review, 7. https://hbr.org/2021/09/collaboration-

Curado, C., Henriques, P. L., Jerónimo, H. M., & Azevedo, J. (2022). The contribution of communication to employee satisfaction in service firms: A causal configurational analysis. Vision, 09722629221101157. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629221101157

Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., … & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International journal of information management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002

Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36.

https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20 de Los Reyes, G. (2023). The all-stakeholders-considered case for corporate beneficence. Journal of Business Ethics, 188(1), 37-55.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05224-9

De Meulenaere, K., Allen, D. G., & Kunze, F. (2022). Age separation and voluntary turnover: Asymmetric effects for collective turnover rates and individual turnover intentions depending on age. Personnel Psychology, 75(4), 865-894.

DOI: 10.1111/peps.12505 de Oliveira Lima, E., & Sri Harta Mimba, N. P. (2024). Interviews, note taking, and preliminary analyses in qualitative research: fundamental precautions. REMark: Revista Brasileira de

Marketing, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.5585/podium.v13i3.27890

Díaz-Mujica, A., Sáez-Delgado, F., Cobo-Rendón, R., Del Valle, M., López-Angulo, Y., & Pérez-Villalobos, M. V. (2022). Systematic review for the definition and measurement of self-efficacy in university students. Interdisciplinaria, 39(2), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.16888/interd.2022.39.2.3

Doaa, J. I. (2024). The effect of Human Resource Management on employee Performance–A

Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(1), 98-

108. https://www.ceeol.com/s

Dong, B. (2023). A systematic review of the transactional leadership literature and future outlook. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 2(3), 21-25.

https://doi.org/10.54097/ajmss.v2i3.7972

Donkoh, S., & Mensah, J. (2023). Application of triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of

Applied Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 10(1), 6-9.

https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/98007485

Dörfler, V. and Stierand, M. (2021), “Bracketing: a phenomenological theory applied through transpersonal reflexivity”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 34 No.

4, pp. 778-793. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2019-0393

Duckett, L. J. (2021). Quantitative research excellence: Study design and reliable and valid measurement of variables. Journal of Human Lactation, 37(3), 456-463.

https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344211019285

Durik, A. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2003). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: Coherence, concordance, and achievement orientation. Journal of Experimental Social

Psychology, 39(4), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00013-1

Dźwigoł, H., & Trzeciak, M. (2023, March). Pragmatic methodology in management science.

In Forum Scientiae Oeconomia (Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 67-90).

https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL11_NO1_4

Ecler Jaqua, Terry Jaqua.(2021) Transactional leadership. American Journal of Biomedical

Science & Research. Economic Review, 1-12: http://dx.doi.org/10.34297/AJBSR.2021.14.002021.

Ediningtyas, D., Aji, B., & Intiasari, A. D. (2024). The Impact of Leadership Type,

Motivation, and Organizational Culture on Employee Performance: Systematic

Review. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting

(DIJEFA), 5(3). https://dinastipub.org/DIJEFA/index

Ellis, M. (2024). Evaluating leadership behaviors and their impact on employee morale: a comparative methodological analysis. Journal of Fundamental & Applied Business

Research, 2(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.70623/ZRIE6676

Errida, A., & Lotfi, B. (2021). The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study. International Journal of Engineering

Business Management, 13, 18479790211016273. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211016273

Falk, I. H., & Guenther, J. (2021). Designed generalization from qualitative research. The

Qualitative Report, 26(3), 1054-1075. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4644

Febrina, S. C., Astuti, W., & Triatmanto, B. (2021). The impact of organizational culture and emotional intelligence on employee performance: An empirical study from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(11), 285-296.

doi:10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no11.0285

Fischer, T., Tian, A. W., Lee, A., & Hughes, D. J. (2021). Abusive supervision: A systematic review and fundamental rethink. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), 101540.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101540

Forner, V. W., Jones, M., Berry, Y., & Eidenfalk, J. (2020). Motivating workers: how leaders apply self-determination theory in organizations. Organization Management https://doi.org/10.1108/OMJ-03-2020-0891

Gagné, M., Parent-Rocheleau, X., Bujold, A., Gaudet, M. C., & Lirio, P. (2022). How algorithmic management influences worker motivation: A self-determination theory perspective. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 63(2), 247.

https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000324

Gaya, H. J., & Smith, E. E. (2016). Developing a qualitative single case study in the strategic management realm: An appropriate research design. International Journal of

Business Management and Economic Research, 7(2), 529-538.

https://www.ijbmer.com/vol7issue2.php

Gebian, G. (2023). The influence of organizational culture, motivation and welfare on employee performance at pt duta persada duper. Dinasti International Journal of

Management Science (DIJMS), 4(6). https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v4i4

George, J.M., Jones, G.R. (1997) Experiencing work: values, attitudes, and moods. Human

Relations 50, 393–416 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016954827770

Giao, H. N. K., Vuong, B. N., Huan, D. D., Tushar, H., & Quan, T. N. (2020). The effect of emotional intelligence on turnover intention and the moderating role of perceived organizational support: Evidence from the banking industry of

Vietnam. Sustainability, 12(5), 1857. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051857

Gupta, A., & Chawla, S. (2024). Toxic leadership in workplaces: Insights from bibliometric, thematic analysis, and TCM framework. International Journal of Organizational

Leadership, 13(1), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2024.60405

Habibullah, K. M., Mohammed, B. U., & Hamza, M. (2023). Conceptual framework in reflexive bracketing techniques in qualitative methodology. Research Review, 4(02), 849-857.

https://researchreview.in/index.php/rr/article/view/161

Hall, M. L., Meyer, C. K., & Clapham, M. M. (2023). Leadership theories and styles understood and synthesized. Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 35(3), 93. https://asbbs.org/jsbbs.html

Hamouche, S. (2023). Human resource management and the COVID-19 crisis: Implications, challenges, opportunities, and future organizational directions. Journal of Management &

Organization, 29(5), 799-814. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.15

Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta- analysis.

Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-

Hartmann, S., Weiss, M., Newman, A., & Hoegl, M. (2020). Resilience in the workplace: A multilevel review and synthesis. Applied Psychology, 69(3), 913–959.

https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12191

Holden, O. L., Norris, M. E., & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2021, July). Academic integrity in online assessment: A research review. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 639814). Frontiers

Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.639814

Holy Bible, New International Version. (2011). Zondervan Press.

Horner, R. H., & Ferron, J. (2022). Advancing the application and use of single-case research designs: reflections on articles from the special issue. Perspectives on Behavior Science,

1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00322-x

Hu, S. (2022). Social and moral practices of the organizations and employee-based brand equity:

female digital labor perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 910483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910483

Hubbart, J. A. (2024). Understanding and Mitigating Leadership Fear-Based Behaviors on

Employee and Organizational Success. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090225

Hui, L. R., Irawan, N., & Limchaicharoen, P. (2021). The impact of corporate culture on Chinese catering: a case study. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting

Research (IJEBAR), 5(3), 2581-2590. https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v5i3.2951

Jafari, N., Heidari, A., Mohaddes, S. M., & Zayandeh, M. (2023). Evaluation of the Dimensions of Organizational Culture Using the Denison Model and Related Factors in Employees of the Gorgan Health Network. International Journal Of Health

Management And Development, 26-29. http://jhd.goums.ac.ir/article-1-30-en.html

Jaqua, E., & Jaqua, T. (2021). Transactional leadership. American Journal of Biomedical

Science and Research, 14(5), 399-400.

http://dx.doi.org/10.34297/AJBSR.2021.14.002021

Jefferson, K., Stanhope, K. K., Jones-Harrell, C., Vester, A., Tyano, E., & Hall, C. D. X. (2021). A scoping review of recommendations in the English language on conducting research with trauma-exposed populations since publication of the Belmont report; thematic review of existing recommendations on research with trauma-exposed populations. PloS one, 16(7), e0254003. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254003

Jerab, D., & Mabrouk, T. (2023). The role of leadership in changing organizational culture. Available at SSRN 4574324. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4574324

Jiatong, W., Wang, Z., Alam, M., Murad, M., Gul, F., & Gill, S. A. (2022). The impact of transformational leadership on affective organizational commitment and job performance: the mediating role of employee engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13,

831060. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.831060

Jin, L., Wu, L., Zhang, J., (2025). Quantitative analysis of literature on diagnostic biomarkers of Schizophrenia: revealing research hotspots and future prospects. BMC

Psychiatry 25, 186 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06644-3

Jo, H., & Shin, D. (2025). The impact of recognition, fairness, and leadership on employee outcomes: A large-scale multi-group analysis. PloS one, 20(1), e0312951.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312951

Jotri, N. N., & Supardi, S. (2023). Productivity and sustainability organization: Leadership, motivation, competence. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 4(5),

906-917. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v4i4

Junianti, E. (2023). Employee turnover: career growth, salary, job satisfaction, organization culture. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 4(5), 881-889. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v4i5.1836

Kachi, Y., Inoue, A., Eguchi, H. (2020). Occupational stress and the risk of turnover: a large prospective cohort study of employees in Japan. BMC Public Health 20,

174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8289-5

Karnia, R. (2024). Importance of Reliability and Validity in Research. Psychology and

Behavioral Sciences, 13(6), 137-141. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.30985.45921

Kaur, J., & Ramkumar, K. R. (2022). The recent trends in cyber security: A review. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(8), 5766-5781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.01.018

Kemp, A. (2024). Competitive advantage through artificial intelligence: Toward a theory of situated AI. Academy of Management Review, 49(3), 618-635.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2020.0205

Khan, H., Rehmat, M., Butt, T. H., Farooqi, S., & Asim, J. (2020). Impact of transformational leadership on work performance, burnout and social loafing: a mediation model. Future

Business Journal, 6(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-020-00043-8

Klasmeier, K. N., Güntner, A. V., & Schleu, J. E. (2025). Leadership dynamics in teams: the reciprocity of shared and empowering leadership. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-025-10008-9

Korakis, G., & Poulaki, I. (2025). A systematic literature review on the relationship between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership – A critical approach, Businesses.

https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses5010004

Kratochwill, T. R., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Machalicek, W., Ferron, J., & Johnson, A.

(2021). Single-case design standards: An update and proposed upgrades. Journal of

School Psychology, 89, 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.10.006

Krause, N. M., Freiling, I., Beets, B., & Brossard, D. (2020). Fact-checking as risk communication: the multi-layered risk of misinformation in times of COVID-19. Journal of Risk Research, 23(7-8), 1052-1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1756385

Kumar, S., Gorodnichenko, Y., & Coibion, O. (2023). The effect of macroeconomic uncertainty on firm decisions. Econometrica, 91(4), 1297-1332. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA21004

Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: psychology, 8(1), 33267.

https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267

Lam, L., Nguyen, P., Le, N., & Tran, K. (2021). The relation among organizational culture, knowledge management, and innovation capability: Its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1),

66. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010066

Lasrado, F., & Kassem, R. (2021). Let’s get everyone involved! The effects of transformational leadership and organizational culture on organizational excellence. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 38(1), 169-194. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM- 11-2019-0349

Leary, T., & Miller, M. (2021). The Toxic Relationship Between Laissez-Faire Leadership and

Employee Burnout: No Longer a Well-Kept Secret. International Leadership

Journal, 13(2). ILJ_Summer2021_Full_Issue_final.pdf

Leary, T., Alderman, N., & Leary, K. (2023). An Effective Implementation of Remote Workplace Practices to Address Unprecedented Challenges During the COVID-19

Pandemic: The Case of Adobe Inc. International Leadership Journal, 15(2).

http://internationalleadershipjournal.com/

Lee, C. C., Yeh, W. C., Yu, Z., & Lin, X. C. (2023). The relationships between leader emotional intelligence, transformational leadership, and transactional leadership and job performance: A mediator model of trust. Heliyon, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18007

Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian

Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

Lin, C., Li, X., & Lam, L. W. (2020). Development or maintenance? Dual‐oriented human resource system, employee achievement motivation, and work well‐being. Human

Resource Management, 59(4), 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21997

Liu, Y. (2024). The Study on the Path of Enhancing Employee Productivity through Corporate Welfare Programs. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 6(10), 198-205. doi:

10.25236/AJBM.2024.061029 .

Long, T., Cooke, F. L., & Mavondo, F. (2025). Developing a resilient workforce in the context of organisational change: the role of employee assistance programmes. The International

Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2025.2458281

M. Skare, M. De, M.De Obesso, S. Ribeiro-Navarrete, de las Mercedes de Obesso, M. Ribeiro- Navarrete, S. De, M. Obesso, M. De, S. Ribeiro-Navarrete, (2023) Digital transformation and european small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A comparative study using digital economy and society index data. International Journal of Information https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102594

Magalhães, S. (2024). Ethics and Integrity in Research: Why bridging the gap between Ethics and Integrity matters. Journal of Academic Ethics, 22(1), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09504-z

Magida, A. (2024, January). The Use of Digital Tools and Emerging Technologies in Qualitative

Research—A Systematic Review of Literature. In World Conference on Qualitative

Research (pp. 257-269). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-

3-031-65735-1_16

Maher, C., Hadfield, M., Hutchings, M., & De Eyto, A. (2018). Ensuring rigor in qualitative data analysis: A design research approach to coding combining NVivo with traditional material methods. International journal of qualitative methods, 17(1), 1609406918786362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918786362

Masood, A. (2013). Effects of job stress on employee retention: a study on banking sector of

Pakistan. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(9), 1-8.

International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications | IJSRP

McKinney, R., Castro, E. S., Bostic, S., McDonald, P., & Fukuda, R. (2023).

Millennials: A profile of desired employer values. SAM Advanced Management

Journal (07497075), 88(3). EBSCO-FullText-07_31_2025.pdf

Motulsky, S. L. (2021). Is member checking the gold standard of quality in qualitative research? Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000215

Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 427-431.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820941288

Natow, R. S. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative research, 20(2), 160-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119830077

Nimbagal, S. V., Karambale, P., & Hiremath, G. S. (2024). Examining the Influence of

Employee Welfare Schemes on Employee Performance. International Journal of Applied

Marketing & Management, 9(1). http://www.publishingindia.com/

Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-based nursing, 22(3), 67-68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145

Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2025). Ensuring validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-

Based Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2024-104232

Nunez, M. (2016). Bridging the 21st-century leadership gap: emerging development practices.

EDU7209 Introduction to Doctoral Studies. https://www.academia.edu/30543240/

Nwagwu, W. E. (2025). Datafication Research (1994–2023): Three decades of evolving methodology in data science. Topoi, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10145-5

Okharedia, A. A. (2020). The role of servant leadership and spirituality in promoting efficiency and productivity in the workplace. Pharos Journal of Theology, 101. http//: www.pharosjot.com

Oladimeji, K. A., Abdulkareem, A. K., & Ishola, A. A. (2023). Talent management, organizational culture, and employee productivity: the moderating effect of employee involvement. Journal of HRM, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.46287/DPKF9953

Olhede, S., & Wolfe, P. J. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Will our jobs be taken by machines?. Significance, 16(1), 6-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-

9713.2019.01224.x

O’Shannassy, T. (2021). The challenges of strategic leadership in organizations. Journal of

Management & Organization, 27(2), 235-238. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.36

P.K. Dey, S. Chowdhury, A. Abadie, E.V. Yaroson, S. Sarkar, (2023). Artificial intelligence- driven supply chain resilience in vietnamese manufacturing small- and medium-sized

enterprises. International Journal of Production.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2179859 

Petković, N., & Rapajic, M. (2021). Employees’satisfaction with communication in the organization. Ekonomika, 67(3). DOI: 10.5937/ekonomika2103039P

Pilcher, N., & Cortazzi, M. (2024). ‘Qualitative ‘and’ quantitative methods and approaches across subject fields: implications for research values, assumptions, and practices. Quality &

Quantity, 58(3), 2357-2387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01734-4

Porkodi, S. (2024). The effectiveness of agile leadership in practice: A comprehensive meta- analysis of empirical studies on organizational outcomes. Journal of Entrepreneurship,

Management and Innovation, 20(2), 117-138. https://doi.org/10.7341/20242026

Quandt, T., & Klapproth, J. (2024). The Silicon Valley paradox: A qualitative interview study on the social, cultural, and ideological foundations of a global innovation.

https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2023-0045

Quintão, C., Andrade, P., & Almeida, F. (2020). How to improve the validity and reliability of a case study approach?. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 9(2), 264-275. https://doi.org/10.32674/jise.v9i2.2026

Råbu, M., & Binder, P. E. (2024). The Single Case Study is a Crucial Bridge between

Research and Practice. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-024-09658-2

Ramlawati, R. (2021). External alternatives, job stress on job satisfaction and employee turnover intention. Management Science Letters, 11, 511-518.

http://growingscience.com/msl/msl.html

Rengkung, L. R., Maweikere, A. J. M., Memah, M. Y., Loho, A. E., & Benu, N. M. (2024). Research (2023), 10.1080/00207543.2023.2179859

Rizvi, I. A., & Popli, S. (2021). Revisiting leadership communication: A need for conversation. Global Business Review, 09721509211061979. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211061979

Robert, V., & Vandenberghe, C. (2021). Laissez-faire leadership and affective commitment:

The roles of leader-member exchange and subordinate relational self-concept.

Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(4), 533-551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-

020-09700-9

Robles, M. M. (2020). “Ups and downs” and “ins and outs” of organizational communication. Business Communication Research and Practice, 3(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.22682/bcrp.2020.3.1.1

Roy, A., Newman, A., Round, H., & Bhattacharya, S. (2024). Ethical culture in organizations: A review and agenda for future research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 34(1), 97-138. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2022.44

Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Rasak, M. S. A., Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-structured Interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education

(IOSR-JRME), 12(1), 22-29. DOI: 10.9790/7388-1201052229

Ryan, T. G. (2020). Action research as a developmental tool for health and physical education teachers. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(2),

279-295. ijci.wcci international.org

Saepudin, T. H., Rony, Z. T., & Ali, H. (2024). Competence, Motivation, and Technology as Determinants of Employee Productivity: Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Dinasti

International Journal of Management Science (DIJMS), 5(6).

https://doi.org/10.38035/dijms.v5i6

Sapiro, A. (2024). Leadership and Managerial Skills. In: Strategic Management. Classroom

Companion: Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55669-2_6

Schlott, C. K. (2024). Design Thinking and teamwork—measuring impact: a systematic literature review. Journal of Organization Design, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469- 024-00177-x

Schlunegger, M. C., Zumstein-Shaha, M., & Palm, R. (2024). Methodologic and DataAnalysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review. Western Journal of

Nursing Research, 46(8), 611-622. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241263011

Schrøder-Hansen, K., & Hansen, A. (2023). Performance management trends–reflections on the redesigns big companies have been doing lately. International Journal of

Productivity and Performance Management, 72(5), 1201-1220.

https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-

Sinnaiah, T., Adam, S., & Mahadi, B. (2023). A strategic management process: the role of decision-making style and organisational performance. Journal of

Work-Applied Management, 15(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-

2022-0074

Soniewicki, M., Paliszkiewicz, J., Koohang, A., & Nord, J. H. (2022). Critical components affecting organizational performance. Journal of computer information systems, 62(5),

965-974. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2021.1954564

Stenfors, T., Kajamaa, A., & Bennett, D. (2020). How to… assess the quality of qualitative research. The clinical teacher, 17(6), 596-599. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13242

Stiglbauer, B., Penz, M., & Batinic, B. (2022). Work values across generations: Development of the new work values scale (nwvs) and examination of generational differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1028072. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028072

Sudhana, A. (2023). Leadership, organizational culture, and work motivation on employee performance with job satisfaction as an intervening variable. dinasti international

Journal of Digital Business Management (DIJDBM), 4(4). https://doi.org/10.31933/dijdbm.v4i4

Sulaeman, R., Amien, N. N., Budiadi, H., Fitriani, H., & Ismiyatun, I. (2024). Toxic workplace culture: causes and consequences. The Journal of Academic Science, 1(4), 384-394. https://doi.org/10.59613/p9hfcf75

T. A. (2023). Manufacturing motivation in the mundane: Servant leadership’s influence on employees’ intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Business Ethics,

188(3), 533-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05330-2

Taneja, S., Atinc, Y., & Pryor, M. (2023). Redefining strategic management: The alignment and implementation perspective. Journal of Accounting, Business & Management, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.31966/jabminternational.v30i2.990

Teece, D. J. (2023). Big tech and strategic management: How management scholars can inform competition policy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(1), 1-15.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2022.0013

Thomas, S., Hennessy, M., Frazer, K., Wild, C., Haynes, A., Kavanagh, S., … & Daube, M.

(2025). Conflicts of interest in public health research and publications. Health Promotion

International, 40(1), daaf009. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf009

Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., & Gonzalez, E. (2020). Planning qualitative research: Design and decision making for new researchers. International journal of qualitative methods, 19, 1609406920967174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920967174

Tsai, Y. (2011). Relationship between organizational culture, leadership behavior and job satisfaction. BMC health services research, 11, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-

11-98

Tsai, Y. (2011). Relationship between organizational culture, leadership behavior and job satisfaction. BMC health services research, 11, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-1-

Urme, U. N. (2023). The impact of talent management strategies on employee retention. International Journal of Science and Business,

28(1), 127-146. DOI: 10.58970/IJSB.2209

Valencia, M. M. (2022). Principles, scope, and limitations of the methodological triangulation. Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n2e03

van der Laan, L., Ormsby, G., Fergusson, L. and McIlveen, P. (2023), “Is this work? Revisiting the definition of work in the 21st century”, Journal of Work-Applied

Management, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 252-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-04-2023-

0035

Van Iddekinge, C. H., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2023). Personnel selection: A review of ways to maximize validity, diversity, and the applicant experience. Personnel psychology, 76(2), 651-686. DOI: 10.1111/peps.12578

Vergossen, H. (2024). Navigating leadership in uncertain times: the role of personality and context. International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science, 13(5).

https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs

Viera, C. A. (2023). Case study as a qualitative research methodology. Performance

Improvement Journal, 62(4), 125-129. https://doi.org/10.56811/PFI-23-0005

Wang, X., & Na-Nan, K. (2024). The influence of competitive strategic management on the performance of Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises. The Journal of Modern

Project Management, 12(1), 68-81. DOI 10.19255/JMPM3406

Watkins, D. C. (2017). Rapid and rigorous qualitative data analysis: The “RADaR” technique for applied research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1),

1609406917712131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917712131

Weber, M. Engert, N. Schaffer, J. Weking, H. Krcmar.(2023) Organizational capabilities for AI implementation—Coping with inscrutability and data dependency in AI Information

Systems Frontiers, 25 (4) (2023), pp. 1549-1569, 10.1007/s10796-022-10297-y

Westland, J. C. (2022). Information loss and bias in likert survey responses. PloS one, 17(7), e0271949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271949

William, F. K. A. (2024). Mastering validity and reliability in academic research: Meaning and significance. International Journal of Research Publications, 144(1), 287-292. https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3030-1094

Williams, J. D. (2012). A marketing management application of Warren Bennis in today’s business environment: Are his concepts still valid in the 21^stcentury. Review of

Management and Creativity. www.intellectbase.org/journals

Williams, S., Glass, A. J., Matos, M., Elder, T., & Arnett, D. (2025). The UK productivity puzzle: A survey of the literature and expert views. International Journal of the

Economics of

Wisnu, R. W. P. P. (2024). Determining Employee Job Satisfaction and Work Productivity: An Analysis of HR Competency and Organizational Culture at PT. XYZ. Dinasti

International Journal of Management Science, 5(5), 1017-1026. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v5i4

Wolniak, R. (2024). The usage of Kano model in Industry 4.0 conditions. Silesian University of Technology Scientific Papers. Organization and Management Series, 196, 625-

640. DOI: 10.29119/1641-3466.2024.196.42

Wynen, J., Van Dooren, W., Mattijs, J., & Deschamps, C. (2019). Linking turnover to organizational performance: the role of process conformance. Public Management

Review, 21(5), 669-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1503704

Yadav, D. (2022). Criteria for good qualitative research: A comprehensive review. The Asia-

Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 679-689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-

Young, H. R., Glerum, D. R., Joseph, D. L., & McCord, M. A. (2021). A meta-analysis of transactional leadership and follower performance: Double-edged effects of LMX and empowerment. Journal of management, 47(5), 1255-1280.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320908646

Zada, M., Saeed, I., Khan, J., & Zada, S. (2024). Navigating post-pandemic challenges through institutional research networks and talent management. Humanities and

Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-

Zhang, D., Pee, L. G., & Cui, L. (2021). Artificial intelligence in E-commerce fulfillment: A case study of resource orchestration at Alibaba’s Smart Warehouse. International journal of information management, 57, 102304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102304

Leadership and Productivity

Improving Business Practices

Share this: